Mailing-List: contact pylucene-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Petrus.Hyvonen@gmail.com
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Petrus_Hyv=C3=B6nen?= <petrus.hyvonen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:52:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP9QEee2fr5x_riZm5HkTH5NSp7XRfwyXGe3t_V41pkoEMw=iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Building jcc 3.0 under linux / anaconda python
To: pylucene-dev <pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a05ecf42609054d284d5c
archived-at: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:53:13 -0000

--001a113a05ecf42609054d284d5c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

First, again - many thanks to all of you who made jcc work with python 3,
this is a great thing!

Now playing with linux building and I am using anaconda python distribution
and it seems like the link library for python is called libpython3.6m.so
instead of the libpython3.6 that other python seems to use and setup.py
assume. I have another called libpython3.

If I remove this extra_links_args it seems to build fine, as well as if I
add a "m" to the end:

       elif platform =3D=3D 'linux':
            #kwds["extra_link_args"] =3D \
            #    lflags + ['-lpython%s.%s' %(sys.version_info[0:2])]
            kwds["force_shared"] =3D True    # requires jcc/patches/patch.4=
3

The -m seems to indicate how python was built:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16675865/difference-between-python3-and-=
python3m-executables

Not sure if there is a danger in removing this, as long as it builds fine?

Best Regards
/Petrus


--=20
_____________________________________________
Petrus Hyv=C3=B6nen, Uppsala, Sweden
Mobile Phone/SMS:+46 73 803 19 00

--001a113a05ecf42609054d284d5c--