Mailing-List: contact pylucene-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0FECC73F-F1B8-40DD-9A62-07520CA83799@apache.org>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1302101349450.6538@yuzu.local>
 <E85BA00D-EAEA-461D-A621-57B26E6EC81A@orbiteam.de>
 <alpine.OSX.2.01.1302112224520.7418@yuzu.local>
 <CAOdYfZWHgFub31LA=fQYxSgF541Q0egOGqkZ1Pz-2EJ9-bFHpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.OSX.2.01.1302131652420.10050@yuzu.local>
 <CAOdYfZU5eAsBXkyYaOeyYZWqHV8HJVvt=+xgt8hXBC-gF5+LqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM21Rt8UmPwN5kaEWaZyMVjv+YmWOMEGvDHPQ8SJb-paEwXG1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.OSX.2.01.1302140024000.10364@yuzu.local>
 <CAM21Rt-nMCDPjPyxd73_AMsXwB7_uGbY0-fnxZFUGj+b39LhhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <0FECC73F-F1B8-40DD-9A62-07520CA83799@apache.org>
From: Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:12:39 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAM21Rt88uWno-Kfp7Jm4G+rVT-eU6eMtStwT0r91VZdD6DnOwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FacetExample.py
To: Andi Vajda <vajda@apache.org>
Cc: "pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org" <pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> So, if each thread gets the same seed, then they should also get the same random values, right ?

They would start from the same seed so if they're calling that Random
in the same pattern then yes -- they'd get the same values. Any real
randomness will be non-reproducible. If this is needed for a test (and
you know it won't be a problem if the test doesn't reproduce) then you
could just do new Random() instead of calling LuceneTestCase's
generator.

D.