lucene-pylucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de>
Subject Re: Feature request: include collation
Date Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:51:15 GMT
Am 27.09.2010 03:59, schrieb Andi Vajda:
> In 3.x and trunk, I've been porting ICU-dependant Lucene contrib features to 
> use PyICU [1][2] (which depends on C++ ICU). I think that having PyLucene 
> depend both on C++ ICU and Java ICU is one ICU too many :-), though.
> 
> I'm not sure at this point which should remain. There are advantages to 
> both... I'm open to arguments in favor of either. You can see examples in 
> the 3.x tree [3].
> 
> (disclaimer: I'm the author of PyICU)

It looks like you have far more experience and knowledge than we do. We
will follow your lead here. ;)

What are the advantages of ICU4J and ICU4C? We already found out that
the default java.text.Collator is slower and not as efficient as the ICU
collator.

Christian

Mime
View raw message