Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of codingvista@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.219.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=BaPS+eeMistg/622iElepVpyWz1mgJQvqoDo2P7Xw/nhNfWF104bI5rL6Ts2BJ2dfI
         SKs46ZPZtpfyd3MEK4Fvfe/VaoZAnMZoinTVC06XLatZYMan7IWT3trmfPOwU3lsABs+
         E0Ny+NtgANoKy3334oxwC6AAIhs0qJct+VaPw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: codingvista@googlemail.com
In-Reply-To: <009701c9ccfe$fc2a9b60$f47fd220$@de>
References: <278836.35723.qm@web8320.mail.in.yahoo.com>
 <009701c9ccfe$fc2a9b60$f47fd220$@de>
From: Wayne Douglas <wayne@codingvista.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:46:19 +0100
Message-ID: <c570b2800905050146y2713e85dx4012c026c1920183@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lucene Java Vs .Net
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org, anmum@online.de
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99e6eebd22e0469265034

--0016e6d99e6eebd22e0469265034
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does anyone have any benchmark data on the performance of these two - purel=
y
out of interest :)

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Andreas Mummenhoff <anmum@online.de> wrote=
:

> yes,
> Lucene.Net is a class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic port of th=
e
> Java Version. The release numbers are the same, so Java Lucene 2.3.1 ~=3D
> Lucene.Net 2.3.1
> And the consequence of this is index compatibility, so you can search and
> fill a Lucene.Net index with Java Lucene and the other way round.
>
> Andreas
>
> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: MBVV.Satish [mailto:mbvvsatish@yahoo.co.in]
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Mai 2009 22:47
> An: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Lucene Java Vs .Net
>
>
>
> Hi,
>  We are currently using Java based Lucene in one of our products. We have=
 a
> product in Microsoft .Net where we intend to use Lucene.Net.
> My question is....
> 1.) Is Lucene.Net has all the features of Java version? or is there any
> specific limitation to .Net version?
> 2.) Is Lucene.Net is class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic  port
> of Java Version? if so are the releases comparable by release numbers i.e=
.,
> .Net 2.3 with Java 2.3?
> 3.) Is it possible to use the same Lucene indexes in Java Version as well
> as .Net Version?
>
>  Please answer my above questions so that it will be helpful in deciding =
on
> the use of Lucene .Net.
>
> Thanks
> Satish
>
>
>      Now surf faster and smarter ! Check out the new Firefox 3 - Yahoo!
> Edition http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/firefox/?fr=3Dom_email_firefox
>
>


--=20
Cheers,

w://

--0016e6d99e6eebd22e0469265034--