Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of James_Shaw@intuit.com
 designates 12.149.175.12 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: s=default; d=intuit.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
 b=U4vI3x69wGuuAksOnP44+on+wUXrj2Bonl5kto42MRDJzxWCglJdyEaDx4UsI8GSl89BBDSC1efTB39n75kJG1zKToT/HvwFoGkV5rXaJ0N/ZAAnHp2oEUi8hLcJJoGE;
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C701DD.B14E8528"
Subject: RE: New user question
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:56:47 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <95570511135B1042A7B5A32693031070021A0A2C@SDGEXEVS01.corp.intuit.net>
Thread-Topic: New user question
Thread-Index: AccB3DxJrhoos3ODS0+Lv9T4XjkTWwAAPH8g
From: "Shaw, James" <James_Shaw@intuit.com>
To: <lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: <george@aroush.net>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C701DD.B14E8528
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Re-sending it to the correct mailing list address since it got bounced
when sent to 'lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org' (someone should update
"http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/" for the correct mailing list
email address!)

One more question: Are there any users of Lucene.NET (not the Java
Lucene, but the .NET version)?  The examples I've seen so far have been
using the Java version.

> _____________________________________________=20
> From: 	Shaw, James =20
> Sent:	Monday, November 06, 2006 11:46 AM
> To:	'lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org'
> Cc:	'george@aroush.net'
> Subject:	New user question
>=20
> Just started looking into Lucene last week for possible usage in our
> desktop product.  Have some questions that I hope to get answered
> first:
>=20
> 1. How often is Lucene.NET synchronized with its Java version?  I read
> from one of the Lucene websites that the original Java version of
> Lucene has gone commercial and is no longer offered as open source.
> Does that mean Lucene.NET worked off the last open source version of
> Java Lucene is now an independent effort (w/o synch'ing with the Java
> version)?
>=20
> 2. I'm a little confused about what version of the Lucene.NET to
> experiment with and to use in our product.  If I want the latest
> stable code, is "Lucene.Net-1.9.final-007-OctSep06.src" the one to
> grab? =20
>=20
> 3. The Lucene I got is still .NET 1.1.  Will there be any issue in
> converting it to .NET 2.0?  Is it on the road-map?
>=20
> Thanks in advance for answering my questions.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C701DD.B14E8528--