lucene-lucene-net-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eyal Post" <eyalp...@epocalipse.com>
Subject RE: Version 1.9
Date Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:07:51 GMT
Yes, I posted this message on sourceForge forums regarding the same issue:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1459068&forum_id=408004
The problem is that these calls are made in the Finalizer thread and the TLS
is not valid that thread.

Regards,
Eyal Post
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tian Luo [mailto:pentian@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 4:22 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Version 1.9
> 
> Don't quite have the time to be a comitter, but there are two 
> method calls in the 1.9 source to do with thread disposal 
> (one is terminforeader) that are not necessary. I can't 
> recall the other method right now, but also contains the 
> {Aroush-1.9} comment ...
> 
> ~TermInfosReader()
> {
> try
> {
> // patch for pre-1.4.2 JVMs, whose ThreadLocals leak 
> //System.Threading.Thread.SetData(enumerators, null); // 
> {{Aroush-1.9}} is this required for .NET ?!
> }
> catch (Exception)
> {
> }
> }
> 
> The use of System.Threading.Thread.SetData is not neccessary 
> and only until I commented the two instances out I would get 
> random system.invalidoperationexceptions when running an 
> indexsearcher in another thread using BackgroundWorker in 
> .NET 2.0. Took me a couple days before I found the source of the bug.
> I believe this issue was also mentioend by someone on the 
> sourceforge forums. Just thought I'd put this out there.
> 
> Regards,
> Tian
> 
> P.S. Oops I just realized this should be under the developer 
> list, apologies.
> 
> On 4/24/06, George Aroush <george@aroush.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > As you may know, only recently have I been able to move 
> Lucene.Net to 
> > ASF, so please be patient while I get 1.9 under SVN.
> >
> > At the main time, I don't want to discourage you or anyone 
> else from 
> > becoming a committer.  We need committers and active 
> community if we 
> > are going to graduate Lucene.Net from incubation.  Please read this 
> > link on how to become a committer:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/learn/newcommitters.html
> >
> > Lucene.Net needs your help and anyone who can contribute.  
> To start, 
> > just download the source for 1.9 (right now it's at 
> SourceForge.net.)  
> > Once you have the code, search for the text "Aroush" in the source 
> > code.  Those are the lines with pending porting issues or reviews 
> > which I need input to finish off 1.9.  If you can take on 
> any of those 
> > pending task, please do so and post your answers here.
> >
> > Right now I am finishing the porting of the "test" code for Lucene 
> > from Java to C#.  In a week or so, I will be releasing 1.9 with the 
> > ported test code to SVN.  The test code will too have remaining 
> > porting issues -- and thus, I will need your help to finish it off.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George Aroush
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Spam [mailto:spam@finnie.co.uk]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 9:52 AM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Version 1.9
> >
> > Sorry to state the obvious, but isn't this the point of having it 
> > available to us via SVN, so we can help? There's not much 
> incentive to 
> > sign up to be a committer if the version available is 
> 1.4.3. If there 
> > were a list of outstanding issues in getting the Nunit test done on 
> > JIRA, I'm pretty certain someone can help.
> >
> > Respectfully,
> > Doug
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
> > Sent: 22 April 2006 14:07
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Version 1.9
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1.9 is still not under SVN.  The NUnit test is not ready 
> for it just 
> > yet, which should happen next week.  Once it's ready I will 
> be adding 
> > 1.9 under SVN.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George Aroush
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Sancho [mailto:dsancho@infolur.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 5:12 AM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Version 1.9
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have downloaded subversion but no 1.9 version. What are the plans 
> > for this version?
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> >
> >
> 


Mime
View raw message