lucene-lucene-net-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress
Date Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:21:39 GMT

40 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LUCENE+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.3%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide

 


> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:18:22 -0800
> From: codekaizen@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress
> 
> I'm not that proficient in JIRA yet, and can only find 22 open issues
> outstanding. Is this correct, or am I missing something?
> 
> -r
> 
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > You can look at the jira issues for Java lucene 3.0.3 and submit patches
> > for 2.9.4g that will bring it up. Worst case is well keep trying to
> > maintain a line by line and the g. Best case is we can use g as a jump
> > point to make it even more .net like and whatever work you do will help us
> > there as well
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rory Plaire
> > Sent: 12/23/2011 2:27 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress
> >
> > So, if there was a very-occasional contributor who wanted to put some time
> > into the project this weekend, is there a way to do it at this time?
> > I'm only interested in the generics port as well as making sure that the
> > translation offers (at least one-way) compatibility with Lucene indexes.
> > -r
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know if we should do that - the generics is quite different from
> > > the line by line port. I would vote we do it personally - I know others
> > are
> > > not ok with it.
> > >
> > > What say other people?
> > >
> > > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Scott Lombard
> > > Sent: 12/23/2011 11:21 AM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward
> > progress
> > >
> > > The Anonymous class issue is a readability issue not a functional change.
> > > So the release could go forward without it. The work should be continued
> > > in
> > > the 3.0.3 version.
> > >
> > > Prescott are you planning on merging the 2.9.4g into the trunk then
> > 3.0.3?
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 4:37 PM
> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other
> > > > forward progress
> > > >
> > > > Im not as familiar with the g branch - the notice issue is
> > > > current, seems like the general incubator has been digging
> > > > everyone for it lately.
> > > >
> > > > Im not sure about the anon or the generics unfortunately
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Rory Plaire
> > > > Sent: 12/22/2011 12:58 PM
> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other
> > > > forward progress
> > > >
> > > > I was just looking at the issues for 2.9.4g since I have a
> > > > bit of time to put against them in the coming week. They are here:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/
> > > > 12316479. Are these current? If so I can just keep going in
> > > > the direction DIGY set to help close them.
> > > >
> > > > -r
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:12 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 I believe you tagged the latest during release. Code be
> > > > reverted
> > > > > +or a
> > > > > new branch to create a patch for 2.9.4 if something major happens
> > > > > since we have scm in place, so I think merging it would not
> > > > be damaging in any way.
> > > > >
> > > > > for the 2.9.4g branch, I would do a quick scan to see if
> > > > there are any
> > > > > outstanding tickets or input from DIGY or anyone else who
> > > > put in major
> > > > > time on that branch. If there are things that are
> > > > outstanding, throw
> > > > > together a quick list that people can pull from and work through.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can throw up some tweets and point towards this thread if
> > > > you would like.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Michael
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Prescott Nasser
> > > > > <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Its been pretty quiet as of late. I'd like to merge 3.0.3
> > > > into the
> > > > > > trunk and wipe out the branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Im going to do this by lazy consensus since responses are
> > > > a little
> > > > > > difficult to come by. Im going to do this Jan 5th - after the
> > > > > > holidays to give everyone the opportunity to respond if
> > > > they think
> > > > > > this is a bad
> > > > > idea.
> > > > > > I will do it quicker if people respond it is a good idea however.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am also going to package up 2.9.4g the week between the two
> > > > > > holidays - if there is anything that needs to get done
> > > > lets get it taken care of.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Finally, if I dont hear any other way in the next day or two
I am
> > > > > > going
> > > > > to
> > > > > > copy the Java lucene jira issues for 3.0.3 release into
> > > > our jira so
> > > > > > that
> > > > > we
> > > > > > can track and start knocking them down.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Happy holidays all,
> > > > > > Prescott
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message