Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <6390803.72461275229356552.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 10:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Digy (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-366) Spellchecker issues
In-Reply-To: <6406603.17561272909121543.JavaMail.jira@thor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12873430#action_12873430 ] 

Digy commented on LUCENENET-366:
--------------------------------

Hi Ben,
I committed SpellChecker 2.9.2
Can you test it?

DIGY

> Spellchecker issues
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ben West
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENENET-366-spellcheck29.patch, LUCENENET-366.patch, LuceneNet-SpellcheckFixes.patch, spellcheck-2.9-upgrade.patch, spellcheck-29.patch
>
>
> There are several issues with the spellchecker:
> - It doesn't do duplicate checking across updates (so the same word is often indexed many, many times)
> - The n-gram fields are stored as well as indexed, which increases the size of the index by several orders of magnitude and provides no benefit
> - Some deprecated functions are used, which slows it down
> - Some methods aren't commented fully
> I will attach a patch that fixes these.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.