lucene-lucene-net-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Jordan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-365) Significant performance improvement for CompressionTools
Date Sat, 01 May 2010 22:31:56 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863066#action_12863066
] 

Robert Jordan commented on LUCENENET-365:
-----------------------------------------

I am aware about the deprecation of Field.Store.Compress, but people are still encouraged
to use CompressionTools directly to store compressed full-text data side-by-side to their
Index.ANALYZED + Store.NO fields. See the XML-docs of Field.Store.Compress.

If we don't want to support CompressionTools, we should deprecate the whole compression stack
and point users to use either System.IO.Compression or SharpZipLib directly.


> Significant performance improvement for CompressionTools
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-365
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Robert Jordan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SupportClass-Reflection.diff
>
>
> I've updated SupportClass.SharpZipLib to perform much faster reflection calls using delegates
in place of Type.InvokeMethod.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message