lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: Optimizing number of segments in lucene index (no writes/deletes, only reads)
Date Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:41:02 GMT
Hi,

This was meant that a *single* search can be parallelized. Of course you can do multiple searches
in parallel. But that is completely unrelated to the question.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Riccardo Tasso [mailto:riccardo.tasso@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:50 PM
> To: Lucene Users <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Optimizing number of segments in lucene index (no
> writes/deletes, only reads)
> 
> 2017-06-14 19:20 GMT+02:00 Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>:
> 
> > You also lose the ability to parallelize searches with an Executor on
> > IndexSearcher!
> 
> 
> How can you say that? Isn't true that multiple reader can access
> concurrently on the same segment?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message