Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A92D200C1C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:44:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 09284160B4D; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 51626160B5E for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:44:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 41734 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2017 18:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 41720 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2017 18:44:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:44:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 567BDC0628 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:44:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.629 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.629 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6lJsKZLvADN for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D88D35F5CC for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id s203so91268388oie.1 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:44:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Zz3r/TUYx17zTyo4xDG1ZEPHvlhPPKW0FOrCikU5poE=; b=SiHuTRuOhly43VJ+0FvYLmztrVubv8zfuj0WBHtOJSa0DwSnyHMvz9+0l63gszPqfj KWA5PbKStiz3lcFwcGhXrtfaYJFAiE9bSOUT68OWdJt55vlSpfVp9koy8XTDeGy5qptt sOeOxKZdIGuoN+hdyDmExFAnjUT9o3AR3mtEvMshMvYmaw8v6JgN1hNa9vE5wOeB+sDZ 4kk9JNDnyX+L9aRT9RfAKM83zqwFdg326g6Lz9RU7SYfyZWWE0uavYBsr1sTM0lerDri HDzWI0xWRoVre58Um49kgGLrQaaewMjAM4xeCvO2w/AAw9lngI9Oj4LY+CrpcXMk5ath N5Zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Zz3r/TUYx17zTyo4xDG1ZEPHvlhPPKW0FOrCikU5poE=; b=nFCYa7XKyCocBiMtiQSeEgjTfFGTXqZ891rvfjVnVla9WhkcMy63hW46XnvhOD255i eKHapVRsWatK/cGepcukfzIOlx4aDdHHouv1dwYDSgvR8tih1nPbEqcZiFZwOABPCzTt yRNtbbTMekV0OvSoB1nT3ea98iX8QenojH4rG9cbe1ovyNDUtoZjXLzQKwYcv8G/R4Z5 gc41M0ez4apJc0wIiz5qwEt4kJDDh50T8zsJn7r+rrF4t1LZ/pW4BJq/tjtcoDHVRbmO veRRaHIGfVruXbneEDNsc2z/Gbv/tppFDBY4cq29kX6pmIY+XBh/ECYUuRJvUmu+E6uK 9zKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nkpNwf0toyICtodhIOCRIS7R3C6eSmQUmoWQb3qDicIJXRSr3uqIKBEjwlO0EgjjxVOv3Dc33O5fVhWQ== X-Received: by 10.202.245.212 with SMTP id t203mr18437345oih.62.1487184274692; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:44:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.227.137 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.227.137 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:44:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Kumaran Ramasubramanian Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:14:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Recommended number of fields in one lucene index To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113df2ba68a13305489612fa archived-at: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:44:46 -0000 --001a113df2ba68a13305489612fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi All, Elasticsearch allows 1000 fields by default. In lucene, What are the indexing and searching performance impacts of having 10 fields vs 3000 fields in a lucene index? In my case, while indexing, i index and store all fields and so i can provide update on one field where we use to take out all stored fields ( except field to be updated) and index everything again ( remove and add remaining fields ). While searching, i use _all_ blob field to search in texts of all fields data. -- Kumaran R --001a113df2ba68a13305489612fa--