Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D799200B95 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7C050160AD2; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C14F7160AB9 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:39:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 4784 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2016 15:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4772 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2016 15:39:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E3ECBC788F for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XEhHbFrzcFP7 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (mail-oi0-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BA3CF5F39C for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id t83so19694244oie.3 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HKXRrxvusGjzWmKJkLQ2198tGhTDSV2XqJzGKUe0DXk=; b=ROGq4waHX9ORRv/L3uTtcWJnzOjPEUCdftJ8C7x52xu4uiycTz611/9yJ1rHQnxp29 sUuBr+HzeMKXAS4P9UibRTcZ2IJq840Np0yeC3tGwakLRceSfMLywt69yHollEvGCZXc RYIAyZ4kSAU3s/AdAlc4biq+Nh4WQdbay/FgFxW8cLAH+vzN2nMyS7DFLGq57oj0O89q 48WMnzHssJKm9/ZKyp5w/fqV+xhOYVLwr7aw9M5EgQfUOJxD8nu12697xtLcrILtbRom fBEMuNzpvmlt1U/CfTgUl8tsSG8s6uLPucTThXVTW7kBc5Gx0j46eMxbES55PWkCDtoU QSnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=HKXRrxvusGjzWmKJkLQ2198tGhTDSV2XqJzGKUe0DXk=; b=lifrVeK5cSs9H8AP3i6gO8h6zrMHPTsy1ZEx7SUeDbHlmxGP8ZDzte2VN82cm7WFkg YPrfj+wv+FDDG4bY74KZbtk2uh1uewl2CEY1o/uEVZDaLbfVjAJuh+etPGDs7MoDd9PJ Ra2HMyMKR4PrHQDL69QVBFouoG8DXDUWzryjph/3RJCqYTSESSZwMhIoukcHRkb59L4o 0FCxz2mNn641Um7mnECGMXsAVfoTN918IFG2ke+Y4VxAcg0ysigAkK8OCvM+xT3ladGx x/4ObgVa629ayvY+zJPnkU3brxswV36eh3jS7X82E1vn050ioqo9OtfBb5Lmx7TWzSW/ JUXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlgoNsO1McEgfBOydQ+RaELPQZ3Zv10fllHBn/Aa2hrkggD5BvYkYCfCmHuPYP5bqxjvxY1exQbEf7Fjw== X-Received: by 10.202.232.21 with SMTP id f21mr7092561oih.98.1474990769020; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.69.38 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: aravinth thangasami Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:09:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Clarification Regarding TieredMergePolicy To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11403e3ad5a362053d7f0c05 archived-at: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:39:34 -0000 --001a11403e3ad5a362053d7f0c05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 what decides that the segment is too big ??? I hope you don't mean the MAX_CFS_SEGMENT_SIZE Thanks & Regards Aravinth On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Michael McCandless < lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > One a merged segment is too big, then it will never be merged again, > unless it accumulates > 50% deleted documents. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:03 PM, aravinth thangasami > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > In TieredMergePolicy, After the sum of segments size reached the > > *MaxMergedSegmentSize* > > the merge will be called. > > My case is, > > The first merge is triggered by *MaxMergedSegmentSize.* > > After that,On addition of one more segment to the index, > > the sum of sizes of segments may be greater than the > MaxMergedSegmentSize. > > will it cause Merge to happen ?? > > > > I guess the tier level merging will make the merge happen. > > > > If merge will happen, Is there any way to delay it ? > > > > please clarify it. > > > > Thanks > > Aravinth > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --001a11403e3ad5a362053d7f0c05--