Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E7C018423 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70444 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2015 07:55:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70387 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2015 07:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70374 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2015 07:55:54 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:55:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C0E81C05AD for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:55:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.98 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=silenteight-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-8Lcm2tl3DU for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 96B892059C for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so10098110wme.1 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:55:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=silenteight-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=f8NkT70ia9knzrYvtFCUx7AkS70xXGnWSsINf+ChJLo=; b=1FtnYG+ttNrU4aY5hHACvuyAB3ZAH0mPPigLR5A7LkFPd6gbxv4/xVuKOV3BdTYdkx KL3GklIswe8BDQa4NfCT8UVqMXVwV8u7M1XzqCvo8iugeaAM48apWd6VlQ+hZiiZ5Fha /QT4tmcZvpNEN4BzMHdnpHqpXY/mUrwbD6AQgClU2FLdek88HlTZlkRA5QDToBrXnhGb Rnnwv79wBAp9gMn4gnmeH0WgydpbwqfYNo7kKICqwpT7p9+WlClRDYD5LA9Z4U5do6HS GIgrxZaNlI1eaKN1NDM5embaVaSdlWE5yGetPDceP1UJFx700P4B50FJON+xaTzJqgmX 7wOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f8NkT70ia9knzrYvtFCUx7AkS70xXGnWSsINf+ChJLo=; b=VDV8fMWORwy86fQ+SMNj0Fu5azi5aqyDbL+D07IcquDWPsDm9xdmK9EiwbRCove3UO Dij/ZxLba49bQDITcbDiVJBtnv+UOGPFhPdtdIxYr2KT5VS7JKNuwgpMcBt0H9zEudRC aWraieaSaSusKUto+Ynx2WW2GXs/FHvjeiNCK/WCRvuy1JBChHkKUcXx1DjtdIBHrFXd p9zYoaHAEIHD8iceWgVisdhQseDCnzoSfwZskRqssnzjn4u5hz7brPs4MlQGoOPNXVxj gO2R+LDUDnM04Y4S33rrhAr8h4fMHMKh4qRbVKYHDkUHObCccLnJAZUtTg9PYJs3gKVz hYaw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQloRcnwlspCYLxSwlG0aqnTE7UKNypdWPLgIncFEfnAs3q95U3U0pdIUGtA4rzUJVi5cSHX MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.72.136 with SMTP id v130mr712319wma.60.1448006146809; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:55:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.107.137 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:55:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: does field cache support multivalue? From: Michael Wilkowski To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b32b60386760524f434ad --001a114b32b60386760524f434ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, according to Lucene in Action book, you cannot use field cache in such situations. MW On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Yonghui Zhao wrote: > If I index one filed more than 1 times, it seems I can't get all values > from lucene field cache? > > right? > --001a114b32b60386760524f434ad--