Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
From: Alan Woodward <alan@flax.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_85B73644-6529-4419-ACC8-E06BADEAE772"
Message-Id: <3321F9BC-7F2D-4C7E-AA32-5CEC13F7F499@flax.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Use SloppyPhraseScorer in SpanNearQuery
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:37:33 +0100
References: <bdd19514060e2d915c326ff7d64fb94e@francelabs.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <bdd19514060e2d915c326ff7d64fb94e@francelabs.com>

--Apple-Mail=_85B73644-6529-4419-ACC8-E06BADEAE772
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

Hi,

SpanNearQuery will also take into account the =91width=92 of the match, =
so that terms that are closer together will score more highly.  Is that =
what you=92re looking for?

Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk


On 10 Sep 2015, at 10:43, aurelien.mazoyer@francelabs.com wrote:

> Hi all,
>=20
> SpanNearQuery and SloppyPhraseQuery can have similar behavior in some =
use cases. On the one hand, I have to distinguish between ordered and =
unordered terms (that=92s enabled with SpanNearQuery) but on the other =
hand, I want to use the SloppyPhraseScorer, that takes the relative =
positions of the terms into account for the score calculation. As far I =
understood, this is possible with SloppyPhraseQuery but not with =
SpanNearQuery. Do you think there is there a way to combine these two =
features to have the best of both worlds?
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> Aur=E9lien
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_85B73644-6529-4419-ACC8-E06BADEAE772--