Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of uwe@thetaphi.de designates
 85.25.204.22 as permitted sender)
From: "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de>
To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org>,
	"'kiwi clive'" <kiwi_clive@yahoo.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1501270901010.30477@frisbee>
 <2005715434.833024.1422385357536.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <2005715434.833024.1422385357536.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:49:45 +0100
Message-ID: <021601d03a6a$674cdfa0$35e69ee0$@thetaphi.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQH3EhLuVkTA7jB7jcjg0J9FpVBlzQFj2SbDnHuRjYA=
Content-Language: de

Java 8 update 20 or later is also fine. At current time, always use =
latest update release and you are be fine with Java 7 and Java 8. Don't =
use older releases and don't use G1 Garbage Collector.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: kiwi clive [mailto:kiwi_clive@yahoo.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:03 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
>=20
> Hi Hoss,
> Many thanks for the information. This looks very encouraging as the =
Java7
> bug I remember  was fixed and as far as I know, we should not be =
affected
> by the others.
> I'll put a few tests together and put my toe in the water :-) Clive
>=20
>       From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
>  To: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" <java-user@lucene.apache.org>; kiwi
> clive <kiwi_clive@yahoo.com>
>  Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:01 PM
>  Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM =
Versions(6->8)
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> : I seem to remember reading that certain versions of lucene were
> : incompatible with some java versions although I cannot find anything =
to
> : verify this. As we have tens of thousands of large indexes, =
backwards
> : compatibility without the need to reindex on an upgrade is of prime
> : importance to us.
>=20
> All known JVM bugs affecting Lucene are listed here...
>=20
> https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs
>=20
>=20
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org