Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B0E611560 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85250 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2014 04:06:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85117 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2014 04:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85100 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2014 04:06:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:06:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.128.182] (HELO mail-ve0-f182.google.com) (209.85.128.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:06:44 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id oy12so6972224veb.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VVaWUppzpyUgTsAJaql48HN3rJ7rBJmD/UP9o/3WAsQ=; b=NfS41yrqB3/vddGl1REYkAxYaRC9YrjQWjwuSJFtja2nzflJj9JkRQ0dAzK778rxva SEkO7AtZvS5oJEH1PsicFi16Xcha076ofml/wX3c+uk8xAgE2/zH46e/GmNvj4tysR3C QltWuyygDADOcvK5x/+lIkv0pkQyW/6M4Fa9QE7KCfLVpjwojo8Tz9VWjtZep0BFyZLz em/vgTim27At3xzr9oHbsW4jQ+wGAhuEO0CN15+kVBaGntouNA7mBGsKKwUF2J1IHxy5 ymSTjH5n7R0SUBJxkTOup527htrUZNKZyyhlmACY0mV6hEs8tXWzk7h5RtDS1eFMhYz5 MgHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmL/9zts5XJ+jUpb81KvMMFpcCIr+xNDa+LRgZoRPULLM3TWg9m6fI3XZZvhJqL6xSORxlZ X-Received: by 10.52.6.227 with SMTP id e3mr19317629vda.10.1403582779779; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:06:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.221.5.3 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:05:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5D5078F9198B04449B9D74EA9E7F3D580FC83564@G1W3640.americas.hpqcorp.net> From: Michael McCandless Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:05:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reusable Performance Tests To: Lucene Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The luceneutil module (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/luceneutil/ ) has benchmarking code for indexing; it's what I use to generate Lucene's nightly performance graphs (http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/indexing.html ). But it's somewhat involved to get it set up ... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Gaurav gupta wrote: > Srividhya, > I am also looking something similar. I will try if I can find something. > > Thanks > On Jun 20, 2014 12:50 PM, "Umashanker, Srividhya" < > srividhya.umashanker@hp.com> wrote: > >> Are there any performance test suites available in lucene codebase which >> can be reused by us to benchmark against our lucene infrastructure? >> >> We are looking at mainly multithreaded indexing tests. >> >> -Vidhya >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org