Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68185CB0F for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21116 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2013 15:00:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21015 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2013 15:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21004 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2013 15:00:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:00:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.220.178] (HELO mail-vc0-f178.google.com) (209.85.220.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:00:29 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ie18so3056003vcb.9 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=9tXnK3+0q0UivNT8EZvCiHWTnFWsUdKHcADCAKcbtEw=; b=lBdZMtyxsmA+SN/E2KK8HeIooX+wZQG5RVh3dsHHLCrDQbQuntETr5BHSj6uPX6DdT xZraCddaE21C1919g38fWHEuaC9Cmd8GrhviT77armVhXm9dxHfmdqBvun+mMPmIKam9 igvxluqr9eTa9LCfFvZr5A3AMctZvm5zEO4o2EniVHaQz5Q2ASbXBKdUCOu3kZUJJTIm h14eGK2ByYNqXuKkxjbw+lLQews6tdKDWW1YDMw/axBrSWPiUhna9Y4oZQ61Nx++2sl8 Hx/+AeLX3Ig4p2q07og9I89Ti3reOorbXX7BvQjPCdLB/55LRyGmy2Mjb0PWM8mHkvOm jmnw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQ3UtM3xVv1q+6qiJ0IgBlrqpc/QU3lKYuT8KHY0il6d8KBCvPC48sQ85bbLqVl/wL0fqW X-Received: by 10.220.144.80 with SMTP id y16mr2364815vcu.4.1383318006983; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:00:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.72.131 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael McCandless Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:59:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Index + Taxonomy Replication To: Lucene Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > Maybe we should offer such a ReferenceManager (maybe it can even be > SearcherTaxonomyManager which takes a pair of Directory in another ctor), > and document that its maybeRefresh needs to be called by the same thread > that modified the index (i.e. commit() or replication). +1, I think we should do this? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org