lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: Why is there a token filter factory abstraction but not a tokenizer factory abstraction in Lucene?
Date Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:41:39 GMT
Hi Benson,

the base factory class and the abstract Tokenizer, TpokenFilter and CharFilter factory classes
are all in Lucene's analyzers-commons module (since 4.0). They are no longer part of Solr.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:benson@basistech.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 12:41 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why is there a token filter factory abstraction but not a tokenizer
> factory abstraction in Lucene?
> 
> OK, so, here I go again making a public idiot of myself. Could it be that the
> tokenizer factory is 'relatively recent' as in since 4.1?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Benson Margulies
> <benson@basistech.com>wrote:
> 
> > I'm working on tool that wants to construct analyzers 'at arms length'
> > -- a bit like from a solr schema -- so that multiple dueling analyzers
> > could be in their own class loaders at one time. I want to just define
> > a simple configuration for char filters, tokenizer, and token filter.
> > So it would be, well, convenient if there were a tokenizer factory at
> > the lucene level as there is a token filter factory. I can use Solr
> > easily enough for now, but I'd consider it cleaner if I could define
> > this entirely at the Lucene level.
> >
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message