Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2003610D61 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84328 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 13:52:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84254 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 13:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84228 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2013 13:52:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:52:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of alan.burlison@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-la0-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:52:38 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id eo20so3079657lab.20 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fOrA79doH4N+i0aRX0wCYVyaptUyYuxsY+aYei2rSh8=; b=cetdWarZA638xT+S4KQ6sNFCp1ldK7GMxawUNFTFr9YWBGGAP39C/BZzucJ5GFeQN8 5yryTiGtWRfAR7HN0/PslSFOiCvH8d5rGpp2SRDPSEAbRjpQVV3n2l82sKA5BSrxBBND gKm6lCX4v3ejVo8WGW1IVfdDmmPcG4AcygHdLJMNK+C6XYwXNyB1dDPYZP37cSKtSLZl 2xg0Uu25kDUEFNIg2RoU4Ye8mz+1E/8E1KqNaUB1WtaLCArMubwWcjisqsbrZxQTZpiT 7MoadQWzkdxQog2IkzTeoKcFHIHRUdcaNHSZMauPyuyVQ6IrYh3KetRepGPd0g6AXQKj i7jQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.5.162 with SMTP id t2mr25016612lat.1.1379339538363; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.55.39 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:52:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple field instances and Field.Store.NO From: Alan Burlison To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16 September 2013 12:40, Michael McCandless wrote: > If you use Field.Store.NO for all fields for a given document then no > field should have been stored. Can you boil this down to a small test > case? repeated calls to doc.add(new TextField("content", c, Field.Store.NO))) result in a single instance of the field showing up in Luke whereas doc.add(new TextField("content", c, Field.Store.YES))) results in multiple instances --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org