Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 jason.nacional@icomteq.com does not designate 61.14.179.242 as permitted
 sender)
From: "Mark Jason B. Nacional" <jason.nacional@icomteq.com>
To: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Assistance for Unified Index Proces
Thread-Topic: Assistance for Unified Index Proces
Thread-Index: Ac6YzSIL60DDyOmjS8GFOPSzhCFDbQ==
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:03:24 +0000
Message-ID: <4DB7F1DF50584D428AEDC9FFA01D23BA61F3A56C@mail1.icomteq.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_4DB7F1DF50584D428AEDC9FFA01D23BA61F3A56Cmail1icomteqloc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0

--_000_4DB7F1DF50584D428AEDC9FFA01D23BA61F3A56Cmail1icomteqloc_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Lucene Developers:

I just want to ask some help regarding our new implementation of indexing p=
rocess.

We use this API for searching a number of documents in a review platform (e=
-discovery).

On our search module, we index a document per folder. The problem is that a=
 user can create his own folder.

Right now, what our developers implemented was to create an index file of a=
ll folders. So imagine if a user will have to select a multiple source fold=
er, we have to iterate to all its index files to get the results.

I was assigned to change this implementation. They called it "Unified Index=
". In this implementation, we have only one index file to manage.

I just want to get information as to how am I going to implemented it in a =
an optimal way.

Any suggestion would be perfect! :)

Thanks!

Mark Jason Nacional
Junior Software Engineer

--_000_4DB7F1DF50584D428AEDC9FFA01D23BA61F3A56Cmail1icomteqloc_--