Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07252CD97 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 08:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6459 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2013 08:32:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6176 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2013 08:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6164 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2013 08:32:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:32:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of manojlucdbt@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.66 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.66] (HELO mail-qe0-f66.google.com) (209.85.128.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:32:28 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f66.google.com with SMTP id 2so241824qea.5 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:32:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HYYAp1sV5hahhhu3DxcG4annnwFgk8eM/5dby+n8T/4=; b=hkKvfsV5Iqnku8lYggx0ffNg4PvWUPEYEdYCF019t0FnnL0dh1YOJ1iZWNX01dY6uU bBQ6nouwj8bPt2KY6XWVlliT+v6fQwTWZhjvapof/FyY1PdcYvBuaurCK3rTfB4kfcgl cgxhaKMNytHldzON25RxjioT72NXjduBMVwmXq9g4P6Xu/ANVWjwpjHiajk7cZaI4nRq kcO9GdzDICNIf3/zqtszo+fAoonbyzsykyQQ7gH+8/cKtqx/aBruqPnZVfAI/7JP4alh VDztS7YWdWFn/JN0/Zsw6LALyI9INxKXM/AiJKaCggRI/cNxy4qIEhmnfBwQcFUMJ+Li HyrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.58.135 with SMTP id g7mr18068375qah.49.1370248327813; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.168.211 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 01:32:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1370245310.24190.ezmlm@lucene.apache.org> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:02:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: confirm subscribe to java-user@lucene.apache.org From: manoj raj To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=20cf3074b03ed55f8604de3bcc60 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3074b03ed55f8604de3bcc60 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074b03ed55f8204de3bcc5e --20cf3074b03ed55f8204de3bcc5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear sir/madam, I have been working with lucene 3.0.3 and wish to upgrade to lucene 4.3 but i found the performance of 4.3. slower than 3.0.3. I have attached the code used to test and results of test along with this mail. Is there any specific usage pattern to be followed to improve the performance of 4.3 LUCENE 3.0.3 PERFORMANCE NO OF RECORDS NO OF FIELDS INDEX TIME (IN MS) SEARCH TIME 1 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME 2 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS) NO OF FIELDS SEARCHED SORT FIELDS INDEX SIZE 1000 3 454 54 1 0 1 NO 66.5KB 10000 3 1117 58 1 2 1 NO 687.7KB 100000 3 2565 71 5 2 1 NO 7.3MB 1000 10 560 64 3 3 3 NO 205.2KB 10000 10 1542 62 3 2 3 NO 2.1MB 100000 10 5018 116 8 9 3 NO 22.7MB 1000 10 601 146 2 2 3 YES 205.2KB 10000 10 1491 72 2 2 3 YES 2.1MB 100000 10 4176 109 7 7 3 YES 22.7MB LUCENE 4.3 PERFORMANCE NO OF RECORDS NO OF FIELDS INDEX TIME SEARCH TIME1 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME2 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS) NO OF FIELDS SORT FIELDS INDEX SIZE 1000 3 648 70 1 0 1 NO 44.2KB 10000 3 1811 73 1 1 1 NO 434.5KB 100000 3 2792 81 2 3 1 NO 4.6MB 1000 10 972 73 1 1 3 NO 130.9KB 10000 10 2181 72 2 1 3 NO 1.3MB 100000 10 5104 79 3 4 3 NO 13.5MB 1000 10 1056 101 1 0 3 YES 130.9KB 10000 10 2080 160 1 0 3 YES 1.3MB 100000 10 5301 262 2 1 3 YES 13.4MB LUCENE 3.0.3 INDEX SEARCHED WITH LUCENE 4.3 NO OF RECORDS NO OF FIELDS INDEX TIME SEARCH TIME1 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS)SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS)NO OF FIELDS SORT FIELDS INDEX SIZE 1000 3 404 31 1 0 1 NO 66.5KB 10000 3 1115 29 1 1 1 NO 687.7KB 100000 3 2383 35 2 3 1 NO 7.3MB 1000 10 657 28 2 1 3 NO 202.5KB 10000 10 1548 31 3 2 3 NO 2.1MB 100000 10 4335 41 6 5 3 NO 22.7MB 1000 10 579 67 1 1 3 YES 202.5KB 10000 10 1645 162 1 1 3 YES 2.1MB 100000 10 4294 292 4 3 3 YES 22.7MB Thanks and Regards, R.Manoj --20cf3074b03ed55f8204de3bcc5e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Dear sir/madam,

I have been working with lucene 3= .0.3 and wish to upgrade to lucene 4.3 but i found the performance of 4.3. = slower than 3.0.3.=A0 I have attached the code used to test and results of = test along with this mail. Is there any specific usage pattern to be follow= ed to improve the performance of 4.3


LUCENE 3.0.3 PERF= ORMANCE

= <= td style=3D"width:10%">1
<= td style=3D"width:10%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top" rowspan=3D"1" val= ign=3D"top"> 1000
= =
NO OF RECORDS
NO OF FIELDS
 INDEX TIME
(IN MS)
SEARCH TIME 1
(IN MS)
 SEARCH TIME 2
(IN MS)
SEARCH TIME3
(IN MS)
NO OF FI= ELDS SEARCHED
SORT FIELDS
INDEX SIZE
1000
3
454
54
1
0
NO
 66.5KB
10000 3
1117
58
 1
2
<= /td>		1
NO 687.7KB
100000
3
 2565
71
5
 2
1
NO
7.3MB
10
560
 64
3
3
3
 NO
205.2KB
10000
 10
1542
62
 3
2
3
NO
 2.1MB
100000
10
 5018
116
8
 9
3
NO
22.7MB
1000
10
601
 146
2
2
3
YES
205.2KB
10000
10
1491
 72
2
2
3
YES
2.1MB
100000
10
4176
 109
7
7
3
YES
22.7MB

LUCENE 4.3 PERFORMANCE
<= td style=3D"width:10%"> NO
= <= td style=3D"width:10%" rowspan=3D"1" valign=3D"top">4
= 160
= =
NO OF RECORDS
NO OF FIELDS
INDEX TIME
SEARCH TIME1
(IN MS)
SEARCH TIME2
(IN MS)
SEARCH TIME3(IN MS)
NO OF FIELDS
SORT FIELDS
 INDEX SIZE
1000
= 		3
648
70
1
0<= br> 1
NO
44.2KB=
10000
3
1811
73
1
1
1
434.5KB
100000
3
2792
 81
2
3
1
NO
4.6MB
1000
10
972
73
1
 1
3
NO
<= /td>		130.9KB
10000
10 2181
72
2
1
3
NO
= 		1.3MB
100000
10
= 		5104
 79
3
3
NO=
13.5MB
1000
10
<= /td>		1056
 101
1
0
3
Y= ES
 130.9KB
10000
102080
1
0
3
Y= ES
 1.3MB
100000
10
= 		5301
 262
2
1
3
Y= ES
 13.4MB


LUCENE 3.0.3 INDEX SEARCHED W= ITH LUCENE 4.3
SEARCH TIME1
(IN MS)
 2.1MB
<= td style=3D"width:10%" rowspan=3D"1" valign=3D"top">5
<= td style=3D"width:10%" rowspan=3D"1" valign=3D"top">1
162
= =
NO OF RECORDS
 NO OF FIELDS
INDEX TIME
SEARCH TIME3
(IN MS)		SEARCH TIME3
(IN MS)		NO OF FIELDS
<= /td>		 SORT FIELDS
INDEX SI= ZE
1000
3
404
31
1
 0
1
NO
<= /td>		66.5KB
10000
3
<= /td>		 1115
29
1
1
1
NO
= 		687.7KB
100000
<= /td>		3
2383
35
= 		2
3
1
NO
7.3MB
1000
 10
657
28
2
1
3
NO
202.5KB
=
10000
10
1548
31
3
2
3
NO
100000
10
= 		4335
 41
6
3
NO=
22.7MB
1000
10
<= /td>		579
 67
1
3
YE= S
 202.5KB
10000
101645
1
1
3
Y= ES
 2.1MB
100000
10
= 		4294
 292
4
3
3
Y= ES
 22.7MB




Thanks and Regards,
R.Manoj
=A0


--20cf3074b03ed55f8204de3bcc5e-- --20cf3074b03ed55f8604de3bcc60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org --20cf3074b03ed55f8604de3bcc60--