Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7AC1F0C1 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 19:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68434 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2013 19:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 68291 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2013 19:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 68279 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2013 19:19:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 19:19:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 19:19:49 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q16so845086vbe.35 for ; Tue, 07 May 2013 12:19:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=3iMU7XrvW1bdLRnMmEN5bGAFa+VNvZYPlyktXLIv6HY=; b=ZtEmTa0T/tvDq3LPnrakIELFseEqqgxAgUZ/RnQBrYNy5RWzgbrnr9gQX/3m/YvpRY 7vnfY2OkL2nTaWTLV/H4OaCPTYC4ryzslV7qmJGx8Z6qHb/l4KOl6wzqcuo7dCQC9Lwb yPjNyF2ZJjI7s4iS508W3hxSwp4HFbfA91ci5eTompJ5jqwbLDl8dy2nK2R6j5hBBVzM KqPAhHCCb4M/X7SJDiSexIKwIbC9kS3Q0uOIiFVwobYrJJKvPQHWlKxRF9WfYqwBVJ6c OWQhTKqf0RTeNhVifrmxA9bTaFVF4ZWzpN3Po89UV1Z6peneClCzomCVbZgmRwk5+qjS b0kg== X-Received: by 10.220.77.2 with SMTP id e2mr2230932vck.63.1367954348579; Tue, 07 May 2013 12:19:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.224.83 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael McCandless Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:18:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TrackingIndexWriter.tryDeleteDocument(IndexReader, int) vs deleteDocuments(Query) To: Lucene Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlShvJX/ZcoDX0JrZRi4ogZCaynTblzpFOHCmVPkfK7mW45+mjRaC1rEll0nm8WvzNrbnbe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Reg wrote: > TrackingIndexWriter.tryDeleteDocument(IndexReader, int) returns an > AtomicInteger indexingGen. And in my case it returns 1 which means the > underlying IndexWriter.tryDeleteDocument(IndexReader, int) returns true. If tryDeleteDocument returned 1 then the delete should have taken ... can you write this up as a test case showing the issue? Are you sure docID 0 is the right document to delete? Remember that the Collector can get multiple docID=0 (one per segment)... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org