Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09730FDC5 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20274 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2013 09:40:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20008 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2013 09:40:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 19948 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2013 09:40:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:40:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elisabeth.adler@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.52] (HELO mail-wg0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:40:03 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id z11so4160746wgg.31 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=srP1Oro12vkBS5SZhMKpAjrRR5GwbO16+LxEe3pqOTI=; b=yCOuSu2VHsXXgfPlF7+047zj4++D62hxG4Y0dSXywPKXIovzPmooaAz0j1wjFskTV/ C/UIxxu0v07UuJLBg4ndnvH6Q2pqOikMQqtd0m3x/LMM2Vc8WNQTLNOo2jFBqDP2ip34 BMQomwhgevx8dWNYtso9/YrX2uWly5XTuRo9vVZCGconvdBi/6S7hUWSwjBMQeBdrl8l RknN/+H7p50mGzTzWbAqiTSdCQWRbkicPGQ23RwwlRcCaRSdYxIrsc2ezrpSAF59Nc2J fOSc9qiWpYzc9MHtrHh2IxjcsWgHhjdz1YXjsCe11EHBw1dq0gpdX51x+VVHR+SIKMAl kflA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.36.205 with SMTP id s13mr7553473wij.31.1369647582587; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.78.146 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:39:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:39:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Difference between Group and Facet From: Elisabeth Adler To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f642b58a0b0de04ddafed60 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f642b58a0b0de04ddafed60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Rajesh, This entry explains it quite well: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8550818/whats-the-difference-between-grouping-and-facet-in-lucene-3-5 Best, Elisabeth On 27 May 2013 11:16, raj wrote: > Hi, > > I was seeing that Lucene supports both Groups and Facets. But I was finding > it difficult to understand the difference between both. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1421 - Says "Ability to Group > search results by Field". So, is this by existing Fields that we add while > indexing or something different as in FacetFields in Facets? > > > Regards, > Rajesh > --e89a8f642b58a0b0de04ddafed60--