Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8920E9FE7 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23634 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2013 13:54:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23385 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2013 13:54:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23373 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2013 13:54:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:54:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.174] (HELO mail-we0-f174.google.com) (74.125.82.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:54:31 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id r6so2160473wey.5 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:54:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=stag9HUidG0fHFWhuCxFb2T4fHRT2ddukT4+G02ZJac=; b=S+L5fPrbxHI6fQmMi3gMA6QWl2f3b3F6S7vI4A+hk4rAsahmQ4Q/3x243kRTQ3O2Hn cL2x3RC1eJT0n+6QfvXTt0/DEgyDvMy3PFWOdYPB7aIjlQtQYUyqqlTfBRLf7rXr1tH2 B2/mSxGTW1LgKNSs699yiUcpoqatn9/5s/KmIaLNea15fGzWXPMuHuosTRlpwzOHYzBN MtaVUS8Kz7hKkXv0fztJoA2XfVd49pkdFUFpJQZ/CJJ2SepVZx+ZvshM/elu7buAihvd lNRCdW5k6H1eNQ0O0C3KgHqfBBTnczUDleq/VoT+X51HT1F5QvDjUaTEnf/9nD7Yn6/3 e5yQ== X-Received: by 10.180.76.84 with SMTP id i20mr4251047wiw.9.1363269249555; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:54:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.85.44 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:53:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1246_1363260160_ZZi0i26xNP024.00_5141B2FF.5030008@uni-bielefeld.de> References: <1246_1363260160_ZZi0i26xNP024.00_5141B2FF.5030008@uni-bielefeld.de> From: Robert Muir Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:53:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lucene version naming of index files To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote: > Hi list, > > a stupid question about the naming of the index files. > While using lucene (and solr) 4.2 I still see files with "Lucene41" in the name. > This is somewhat confusing if lucene 4.x produces files with "Lucene4y". > This also means indexes built with 4.2 or 4.3 are fully compatible with 4.1 ? No and No. Its just that the postings format is unchanged since 4.1 Don't try to read anything more into it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org