Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8229E9A4E for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28243 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2013 23:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 28189 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2013 23:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 28180 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2013 23:25:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.170] (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:25:51 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p16so3842139vcq.29 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:25:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=P/Yrw68yASb1x/5klz8zeoDqCxaBitdD/JXbzCDPkGo=; b=T+sBWuziuMd6R1mKMSJOJ4VOYshtUbg0XEJieJykB8PIUwmX+HaGj3AMuTUh8AgGTY h6LXbqg15BNN9Er1txH4bHBNwItJJoChBYfRbTyH2bfkTZc2k24i6oTdcaQOHR3PhJUn nXgOUCKwi3jAl44uvN9AkARJRNo8PtoqibSrHv2/RqDwqQm5M0s1g+5IbE8euS8+hDNS QhsjaZkmjoyx/CzEGT/TMiEM3qPl8ZAK9X08vh7zZV+Y7m+jGSctVYpftJD3LgrBzBHL 7nsADHExpM1cS+7G2QQUXQpTQFi76zY5u9uJQqav552DJWNEcz8LJmdxkez+Cz0xGPdc 1eEA== X-Received: by 10.220.148.194 with SMTP id q2mr8551693vcv.29.1362439530094; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:25:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.212.12 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:25:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1362438055529-4044670.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1362413349571-4044544.post@n3.nabble.com> <008101ce18f3$83decf60$8b9c6e20$@thetaphi.de> <1362414500655-4044550.post@n3.nabble.com> <1362438055529-4044670.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Michael McCandless Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 18:25:08 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lucene 4.1: IntField cannot be found by a NumericRangeFilter/NumericRangeQuery To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9XunnZxE/eKSYblpKFTe8PyeIzQ2ky7FJQd33LqqbIpT/HLuB2Ekj/FliICnsi6KLjcXs X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Phew, thanks for bringing closure! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Konstantyn Smirnov wrote: > Ah yes, my bad! > > I indeed used my own fieldTypes for my numeric fields. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-4-1-IntField-cannot-be-found-by-a-NumericRangeFilter-NumericRangeQuery-tp4044544p4044670.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org