Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01B3F9286 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84384 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2013 10:45:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84000 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2013 10:45:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83958 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2013 10:45:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:45:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of uwe@thetaphi.de designates 188.138.97.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [188.138.97.18] (HELO mail.sd-datasolutions.de) (188.138.97.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:45:42 +0000 Received: from VEGA (port-92-196-61-239.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.61.239]) by mail.sd-datasolutions.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99C9E14AA036 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:45:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uwe Schindler" To: References: <009901ce1e2b$e045f070$a0d1d150$@thetaphi.de> <00bd01ce1e40$d516bb20$7f443160$@thetaphi.de> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:45:22 +0100 Message-ID: <002401ce1f0e$b26b9040$1742b0c0$@thetaphi.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJOTLCxm4ClWFg3ewy1TEXBbWZ6dgJh994WAIS9l6EB03fAMQFdFf5kl3DJzbA= Content-Language: de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Uwe, Just re-iterating so that I am understanding your statement right > without ambiguity. I use standard analyzer for all english and numerals. I > don't have a problem when reading 2.3 migrated indices with 4.1, right? > > Sorry, for the doubt again. YES! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org