lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ramprakash Ramamoorthy <youngestachie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3
Date Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:41:18 GMT
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy <
youngestachiever@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> In that case, it should be fine. Otherwise you would need to reindex.
>>
>> Thank you Uwe.
>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:42 AM
>> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3
>> >
>> > If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in trouble unless you use
>> > StandardAnalyzer with Version.LUCENE_23 and you are using non-western
>> > language. If you change your code to use Version.LUCENE_41, you have to
>> > reindex.
>>
>
Uwe, Just re-iterating so that I am understanding your statement right
without ambiguity. I use standard analyzer for all english and numerals. I
don't have a problem when reading 2.3 migrated indices with 4.1, right?

Sorry, for the doubt again.

> >
>> > -----
>> > Uwe Schindler
>> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> > http://www.thetaphi.de
>> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>> >
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Ramprakash Ramamoorthy [mailto:youngestachiever@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:38 AM
>> > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3
>> > >
>> > > Dear all,
>> > >
>> > >         We are moving our codebase from Lucene 2.3 to 4.1. Also, we
>> > > are migrating the older indices from 2.3 to 3.6 and then to 4.1. Would
>> > > be glad if you can share some do's and dont's during migrating the
>> > > indices, which you have experienced before.
>> > >
>> > >         Also, the 2.3 indices were written using a standard analyzer
>> > > then and the current indices will use standard analyzer, version_41.
>> > > Hope there shouldn't be a problem reading the migrated indices because
>> > > of the analyzer version change? Thanks in advance. Glad if you can
>> help.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > With Thanks and Regards,
>> > > Ramprakash Ramamoorthy,
>> > > India.
>> > > +91 9626975420
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With Thanks and Regards,
> Ramprakash Ramamoorthy,
> India
> +91 9626975420
>



-- 
With Thanks and Regards,
Ramprakash Ramamoorthy,
India
+91 9626975420

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message