From java-user-return-55122-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Mon Feb 18 18:33:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FE2AD234 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13478 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 18:33:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13433 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 18:33:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13423 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2013 18:33:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:33:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of saisantoshi76@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:33:14 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7VWH-0006uP-AQ for java-user@lucene.apache.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:32:53 -0800 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:32:53 -0800 (PST) From: saisantoshi To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1361212373311-4041177.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: IndexSearcher.close() removed in 4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I understand from the JIRA ticket(Lucene-3640) that the IndexSearcher.close() is no-op operation but not very clear on why it is a no-op? Could someone shed some light on this? We were using this method in the older versions and is it safe now to remove this call. Just want to understand the consequences before we make any changes? Is there any alternative that we need to use here? Thanks, Sai -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/IndexSearcher-close-removed-in-4-0-tp4041177.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org