Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHibZ_6Wp7rcrcSOtNErGLfZzgFP__omjL9HSJOJ2MKpqWCGzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHibZ_4=LygLoXiezdrdeer-pwCr02JDqLbLV2dXXKZr05OJSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL8PwkbmuW3XgW0fWSq0qwChdzLPeR9E3Y=04eLFbnUW1CGzsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHibZ_6Wp7rcrcSOtNErGLfZzgFP__omjL9HSJOJ2MKpqWCGzg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:23:31 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAL8PwkYYnL2U0YeDmfGQLAjeRMgHTfA6y3Cu9E12v9xDRdE9XA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Terms.getSumTotalTermFreq() in Lucene 4.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

The next version won't have a fix for this unless someone opens an
issue / posts a patch.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:59 PM, =C0=E5=BF=EB=BC=AE <need4spd@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> Hello Mike.
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> It's not an important issue.
> I'll waiting for next release version including this patch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2013/1/4 Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com>
>
>> The problem is that the TermVectorsFormat for the default codec
>> (Lucene40TermVectorsFormat) does not store this statistic
>> per-document, currently.  We could in theory fix this ... maybe open
>> an issue / make a patch if it's important?
>>
>> -1 return value is actually "valid": it means this statistic is not
>> available.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:39 AM, =C0=E5=BF=EB=BC=AE <need4spd@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> > I have some questions.
>> >
>> > Document 1 : "learning perl learning java learning ruby"
>> > Document 2 : "perl test"
>> >
>> > I have indexed this documents, with StoreTermVectors(true) and
>> > IndexOptions.DOCS_AND_FREQS.
>> > Field name is "f".
>> >
>> > And I executed this code.
>> >
>> > IndexReader ir =3D IndexReader.open(dir);
>> > Terms terms =3D ir.getTermVector(0, "f");
>> >
>> > System.out.println(terms.getDocCount()); -> 1
>> > System.out.println(terms.getSumDocFreq()); -> 4
>> > System.out.println(terms.getSumTotalTermFreq()); -> -1
>> >
>> > I think this terms instance acts like a single-document inverted index=
.
>> >
>> > So getDocCount is 1 (single document), and getSumDocFreq is 4. (becaus=
e
>> > each term's docFreq is 1)
>> > Is this right?
>> >
>> > But I can't understand why getSumTotalTermFreq method return -1.
>> > In javadoc getSumTotalTermFreq is sum of
>> >
>> TermsEnum.totalTermFreq<eclipse-javadoc:%E2%98%82=3DaboutLucene4/lib%5C/=
lucene-core-4.0.0.jar%3Corg.apache.lucene.index(Terms.class%E2%98%83Terms~g=
etSumTotalTermFreq%E2%98%82TermsEnum%E2%98%82totalTermFreq>
>> > .
>> >
>> > I think in Document1, each term's totalTermFreqs are [learning, 3],
>> [java,
>> > 1], [perl, 1], [ruby, 1].
>> > So getSumTotalTermFreq method's result is 6 not -1.
>> >
>> > Why temrs.getSumTotalTermFreq() method return -1?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> > --
>> > DEV=BF=EB=BD=C4
>> > http://devyongsik.tistory.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> DEV=BF=EB=BD=C4
> http://devyongsik.tistory.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org