Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOdYfZUjmNrbxz_FOOOFCwVWn76wwHgjm15ovpqNL1yB0V_Jkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMySt+Fw_PPig1-xF9=EzRnH3ipj=q3sWDyGBd4bVLuCEGh-hA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOdYfZUjmNrbxz_FOOOFCwVWn76wwHgjm15ovpqNL1yB0V_Jkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:53:04 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAOdYfZUH6vfSJZBwVaweDk1p7wHE_LZ0Y5j8ibEw_dwBHxRKgA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CheckIndex ArrayIndexOutOfBounds error for merged index
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447882dfc27b604d022022f

--f46d0447882dfc27b604d022022f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm particularly thinking its something like
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5091921

We tried to add workarounds to lucene to dodge problems from this, but
really a newer unaffected version would be safer.

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Tom Burton-West <tburtonw@umich.edu>wrote:
>
>> java.version=1.6.0_16
>
>
> Tom can you use a newer java version for this? That's pretty old, and
> seeing such a crazy field number worries me that its some jvm bug.
>
> you could even try to run the checkindex itself with a newer java, just in
> case the index is fine (it might not be)
>
>

--f46d0447882dfc27b604d022022f--