lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mark harwood <markharw...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Lucene 4.0, Serialization
Date Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:26:39 GMT
This was part of the rationale for introducing the XML Query Parser:

1) An extensible query syntax that is expressive enough to represent the full range of Lucene
functions (filters, moreLikeThis etc)
2) Serializable
3) Language independent
4) Decouples the holder of query criteria from the  implementations that execute the query.

Cheers
Mark

________________________________
 From: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
To: Lucene Users Mailing List <java-user@lucene.apache.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2012, 9:43
Subject: Re: Lucene 4.0, Serialization
 
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:33 PM, BIAGINI Nathan
<nathan.biagini@altanis.fr> wrote:
> I need to send a class containing Lucene elements such as `Query` over the
> network using EJB and of course this class need to be serialized. I marked
> my class as `Serializable` but it does not seems to be enough:
>
>     org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery is not Serializable
>
> Indeed, when i read the javadoc of the last stable release of Lucene (4.0),
> i can see that `TermQuery` does not implement Serializable, `Query` neither.
> What i don't understand is why those classes used to implement
> `Serializable` in the last release (3.6.1), and why it's no longer the case?

Although I am curious about this myself, couldn't you just send a query string?

TX

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message