Return-Path: 
 <java-user-return-53439-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1898D0BE
	for <apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu,  2 Aug 2012 13:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 7901 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2012 13:01:39 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7519 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2012 13:01:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:java-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7396 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2012 13:01:39 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:01:39 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com)
 (209.85.220.176)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:01:32 +0000
Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so9691598vcb.35
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=ALw89lD2sslsHMFYUJz0vu2fWeTjYiyY2vQsbj8S+d0=;
        b=oOcOj3YpbvFXsUTS2gZe9LnF32uav34i8B9FsMjd/KWuY8MDnStuxwvakvXTPrUgi2
         KxgcFohSxXyrlwZhAt2heXBaIAZHLiQkdMYVQzHL2tbIiWmmb+aZ5a/4XAxQzpwAyyJf
         /Q07snFQQo+J7PhhEN+uIX+37pxml6OcyuP/pu2Jnn2ExdYJwcY/I0QOCB2g7wirpXM6
         jSXs7QFnTVKa25sTouY2eQ76bMLmzmLIM/aRgkVwXcsY3/fGNSsvaxoxJj/PxoH+Eg0e
         j9K6/XSfWZ/Cuzvgs8Cc4h5aJE4DppDuerCf8lHbB9QR5oGM2qPNn3PTT+Pto4VNfeGz
         pH5A==
Received: by 10.52.72.44 with SMTP id a12mr17319396vdv.124.1343912471778; Thu,
 02 Aug 2012 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.117.13 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 06:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHAQt5MqEencUXtmhDgCEmzwCY8+F+Gct5d1DyUj3=2aRv3GSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPed7Ma4bFpHO640-EenU6v=igOTfzsSNq8a4bHOdQPKe5PmXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOdYfZV71R8umTaWa0qP-cuUzDZZON9RmpExHUN8u2nG5y905w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPed7MbSP9VkwmJqUG1p7_1CqN2km=ZG5-saUJ2WvPTjWEnxBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAHmpkgbfkoTuNKP8Q8cbKhmf3ZW9rZAY2wiUB5VWD6SbyDnjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHAQt5MqEencUXtmhDgCEmzwCY8+F+Gct5d1DyUj3=2aRv3GSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:00:51 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAOdYfZUrMxP1=hQHSXEP8QK7XykG2sNCrQzNmMvAamxNFy=qZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Memory leak?? with CloseableThreadLocal with use of Snowball
 Filter
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: simon.willnauer@gmail.com, java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Laurent Vaills <laurent.vaills@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there any chance to get his backported for a 3.6.2 ?
>

Hello, I personally have no problem with it: but its really
technically not a bugfix, just an optimization.

It also doesnt solve the actual problem if you have a tomcat
threadpool configuration recycling threads too fast. There will be
other performance problems.

-- 
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org