Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jochenhebbrecht@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1341241866.27338.22.camel@localhost>
References: 
 <CAJcVXktYFZVPv-3oLY0cE5c--PHZUWGFcj6Vpe7ehT3Geda2Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1341241866.27338.22.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:06:14 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAJcVXkvWVwYw4uSa-RzXCE1TPaNMO6RcpNTo-fLhJ9xOusaPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best practise closing Lucene index
From: Jochen Hebbrecht <jochenhebbrecht@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tkrah@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d4d380e231e04c3ef1841

--bcaec54d4d380e231e04c3ef1841
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks. We are currently more thinking of a statefull EJB. We are thinking
to use the @Remove annotation ...


2012/7/2 Torsten Krah <tkrah@fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de>

> I you really want a per session based reader, use a
>
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/5/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpSessionListener.html
>
> and create the object there in sessionCreated and destroy the Reader in
> sessionDestroyed.
> You seam component can get the create objected under a well known name
> you've choosen from the session.
>
> So you won't miss to close the object and won't leak file handles.
>
> regards
>
> Torsten
>
> Am Montag, den 02.07.2012, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Jochen Hebbrecht:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I currently have a Seam component which is in my session. This component
> is
> > holding (private attribute) a custom "Lucene object" which opens a Lucene
> > index in the constructor. When I want to search, I use the "Lucene
> object"
> > in my session which uses the already opened Lucene index.
> > So when I want to search on something else, I can still reuse the already
> > opened index.
> >
> > But now, I don't have some Java logic which closes the reader. Shouldn't
> > this be done in some method like the destroy() method (which is called by
> > te JVM)?
> > Or is it ok if I don't manually close the reader?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jochen
>
>

--bcaec54d4d380e231e04c3ef1841--