Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of findbestopensource@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A03F9F5D-30FD-4F6C-A700-64704520089D@gmail.com>
References: <A03F9F5D-30FD-4F6C-A700-64704520089D@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:46:43 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAE9W93O9H4s-oSyBaXawHaam1nqYgQjW7N2Pr_oag3-a16AjYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lucene vs SQL.
From: Aditya <findbestopensource@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8006ef7c7904c5c9a78c

--047d7b3a8006ef7c7904c5c9a78c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Check out these articles on this topic. Hope it helps.
http://www.findbestopensource.com/article-detail/lucene-solr-as-nosql-db
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/04/30/nosql-lucene-and-solr/

In nutshell, It is good to use Lucene as NoSQL but better have your data
stored in some persistent store like file system or a database.

Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com


On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Hank Williams <hank777@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I want to set up a database that is totally flat with no joins, is
> there any reason not to use lucene. The reasons I would be curious about
> are things like insert performance and whether there are any queries that
> either don't work in lucene or perform better in MySQL/postgres.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

--047d7b3a8006ef7c7904c5c9a78c--