lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From findbestopensource <findbestopensou...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance of storing data in Lucene vs other (No)SQL Databases
Date Tue, 22 May 2012 08:19:29 GMT
Just updated my view in the article.. Feel free to add your comments..

http://www.findbestopensource.com/article-detail/lucene-solr-as-nosql-db

Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com


On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Shashi Kant <skant@sloan.mit.edu> wrote:

> A related thread on Stackoverflow:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3215029/nosql-mongodb-vs-lucene-or-solr-as-your-database/3216550#3216550
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Konstantyn Smirnov
> <injecteer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > apologies, if this question was already asked before.
> >
> > If I need to store a lot of data (say, millions of documents), what would
> > perform better (in terms of reads/writes/scalability etc.): Lucene with
> > stored fields (Field.Store.YES) or another NoSql DB like Mongo or Couch?
> >
> > Does it make sense to index and store the data separately?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message