lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantyn Smirnov <inject...@yahoo.com>
Subject Performance of storing data in Lucene vs other (No)SQL Databases
Date Fri, 18 May 2012 14:44:03 GMT
Hi all,

apologies, if this question was already asked before.

If I need to store a lot of data (say, millions of documents), what would
perform better (in terms of reads/writes/scalability etc.): Lucene with
stored fields (Field.Store.YES) or another NoSql DB like Mongo or Couch?

Does it make sense to index and store the data separately?

TIA

--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-of-storing-data-in-Lucene-vs-other-No-SQL-Databases-tp3984704.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message