Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6F119990 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9175 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2012 20:15:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9122 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2012 20:15:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9113 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2012 20:15:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:15:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xonixx@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:15:32 +0000 Received: by yenl3 with SMTP id l3so6144701yen.35 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oU4IBilzTqVxvMqtRyhw++hl7lx+R+yynu9X2pNGGd8=; b=p3e5dD5xkLxX7GMk8UBTLNfNtLv9Gc1LCdWxzyY2FA+gBmtWbZsjegKvanDDObocb2 rUapG0jptKDQ3akRqhBNokNt+9cZdt3848xUv75rSjEXbaUI0+SQyvFktNr0ajfXIiG5 Jg6bqVFOxR8oeFJ03yvvyNf1iMOBg+PZ9RZMZjG2ldHNxaj+m2jpeDf47dR4n0cgrPpr jnjnnpOtuPLzw/AeHyFqNwk5Id/Uf9kz3C8vmKanNcpXwg2Bs7I1LCZHMtsDToC/aVn1 xQk8LFYrfEy9Hw7SZ7K0MCQc8aupw6g28uQV/vtz9pDNsmjX08o9olELZuTvyYeH4Fys cvzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.80.66 with SMTP id j42mr274071yhe.110.1334866511459; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.111.13 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <030701cd1e45$11b0d270$35127750$@thetaphi.de> References: <030701cd1e45$11b0d270$35127750$@thetaphi.de> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:15:11 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Two questions on RussianAnalyzer From: Vladimir Gubarkov To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: >> My questions are: 1) it this change is by design (not a mistake) and >> 2) is the only option to achieve old behaviour is to use >> Version.LUCENE_30 for creating analyzer? > > This is why this option is there! Right and it's great, but this not answers my questions, actually =). > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org