Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of teddyyyy123@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFAd71UCmd180mbmYeRSP_t4ehH=sxGVQs06S-wsCjn2dVsPuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAnh3_8p1hvLionR+-PAkWa0KavggFgGK=DREJZwwDnNZC7U-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFAd71UCmd180mbmYeRSP_t4ehH=sxGVQs06S-wsCjn2dVsPuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yang <teddyyyy123@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:57:39 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAAnh3__7LMqoA8iLUU5=tX7zJPe1pQmBS3tbg437C3UPJL6JaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: lucene algorithm ?
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04016a877bc6fe04beae85f8

--f46d04016a877bc6fe04beae85f8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

yes, that's why many search engines will not allow user visit page
> number greater than a threshold. for most application, users usually
> only visit top results. That's why ranking algorithm is important. if
> you found your users always turn to next page, I think you should
> consider your application. you should provide more filter condition or
> improving ranking algorithm.
>
> >
>


interesting, I just tried google "yellow dog"  and ask it to retrieve from
the 900's result,  the access time is 0.6 seconds, while the first page
comes out in 0.33 seconds (well of course the first page result may well be
cached,
but as I go from the first page to the 8'th page, the time does
consistently increase)


https://www.google.com/#q=yellow+dog&hl=en&prmd=imvns&ei=Q_maT433OombiQeB3dm1Dg&start=900&fp=a2cbb8d5ae567362

--f46d04016a877bc6fe04beae85f8--