Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91D079D72 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13169 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2012 15:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13093 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2012 15:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13085 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2012 15:14:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:14:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:14:48 +0000 Received: by pbaa12 with SMTP id a12so10123836pba.35 for ; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 07:14:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lVn7Xw9s8E8xlA/vjwJrTL0LifbxovI3ZCCXT3urwHA=; b=w1W/FPrt08B4rKag0BcH3Ksvzh14szlVGze6pobFIxrPIPrAnO10JWO/6anORMuxPI I0o5EITkEaTS8DsWWkaJWHne9+y4Sa6F/ES7XB1WsQVws8acVKhVwJxGDfaWU1acFLAU ZgDYu5UEQfrjyasQL0Rp5h4Kb0usJKs6h+KXY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.73.100 with SMTP id k4mr81136188pbv.55.1325430868194; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 07:14:28 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.250.4 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 07:14:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 10:14:28 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nWTshRrPHSc9_ILojLDGryzBdv8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Spatial Search From: Yonik Seeley To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Lance Java wrote: > But I'm a bit worried about this solution since Yonik has pointed out that > the tier based approach is broken. Yonik, any more info on why this is > broken? Perhaps a bounding box that works is better than a circle that > doesn't ;) Haven't used it myself, but it seemed to be the opinion of others who did. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599 http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c32e81783642df47/spatial_rethinking_cartesian_tiers_implementation -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org