Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07F1695FB for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24698 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2012 09:32:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 24345 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2012 09:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 24332 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2012 09:32:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:32:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paul_t100@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.111.4.27] (HELO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:32:24 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6882020A82 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:32:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:32:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=4071u0VCu+ j6zFTH4R9k/oOQUio=; b=MopLVl0Y7dk1lsDcr9c0/9+yEozoWpSb+wbdXndpLX uVlHSmbbPDjOQzHWLM2NtmSnMtZ2wFXP7nFbUUDx4+T32+w/c2QLkQMbtA580rgX nEnboZqFBT8MRdUcOV7ReUOwV2cdtha52aRpM6bqcYJdGvYntZ6KwX/KjGHrJOXF 0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to :mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=4071u0VCu+j6zFTH4R9k/oOQUio=; b=V9EdCQPQgs96yLi5g dPBM/Flh+DZpFFh3CK1vkKxSh0Z1aftyqxLrM8Qr4jOC79QNjhTIXlHpFI1h2FGR BtYDH4bDzwsojoBbdRB+odu2YydjXYhsY9cPn7bSFurgCfQE3fpcK715OKV2758T M4LlODxLsCUrmtoppR45+bCg4s= X-Sasl-enc: 4gvOHnTW05HwwQTGhT2VBG2bRbW3VJHS+E/YluT+UJGR 1327743122 Received: from macbook.lan (unknown [217.155.98.246]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A04758E0221 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:32:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F23C0B9.2040401@fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:32:41 +0000 From: Paul Taylor Reply-To: paul_t100@fastmail.fm User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'java-user@lucene.apache.org'" Subject: Does Fuzzy Search scores the same as Exact Match Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All things being equal does a fuzzy match give the same score as an exact match. i.e if I do a search for farmin and it matches two docs one on term farmin, the other on term farming, will it score farming higher or score both the same ? Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org