Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D21F95B5 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88496 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2011 22:16:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 88433 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2011 22:16:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 88425 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2011 22:16:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:30 +0000 Received: by eaac13 with SMTP id c13so444075eaa.35 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:16:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ifJWySkPLos/RpvROXmilkbV+pffN+jb8m0UHdI9sB0=; b=yDlucRDioLvbmF91iHf563XX9eGcizEr9cryeBA3/cYObfeMIXiyyzuzemux1J5Juv aYe2d/iJMfPKztuYnbQWPo0KQf0BdyjUcYXBKrI/UBaQ5M2YSGalSkK8I8T1Jfr1UwdB eK9RqyIcCmewm6bGssKKqbZdL7v1QQewIxK10= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.146 with SMTP id p18mr1244848ebp.27.1323382568435; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.142 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:16:08 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: markrmiller@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <4EDED0A8.5010401@ontrenet.com> <4EDF7208.9070908@ifactory.com> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:16:08 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lucene 4.0 Index Format Finalization Timetable From: Mark Miller To: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015177fd05ce4c03904b39c0383 --0015177fd05ce4c03904b39c0383 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 While we are in constant sync due to the merge, lucene would still be updated multiple times before a solr 4 release, and it would be subject to happen at any time - so its really not any different. On Wednesday, December 7, 2011, Jamie Johnson wrote: > Yeah, biggest issue for us is we're using the SolrCloud features. > While I see some good things related to the Lucene and Solr code bases > being merged, this is certainly a frustrating aspect of it as I don't > require some of the changes that are in Lucene 4.0 (withstanding > anything that SolrCloud requires that is). > > I think the best solution (assuming it works) is to try to lock a > version of Lucene 4.0 while upgrading Solr. I'll have to test to see > if this works or not, but at least it's something. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mike Sokolov wrote: >> My personal view, as a bystander with no more information than you, is that >> one has to assume there will be further index format changes before a 4.0 >> release. This is based on the number of changes in the last 9 months, and >> the amount of activity on the dev list. >> >> For us the implication is we need to stick w/3.x for now. You might be in a >> different situation if you really need the 4.0 changes. Maybe you can just >> stick w/the current trunk and take responsibility for patching critical >> bugfixes, hoping you won't have to recreate your index too many times... >> >> -Mike >> >> >> On 12/06/2011 09:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: >>> >>> I suppose that's fair enough. Some quick googling seems that this has >>> been asked many times with pretty much the same response. Sorry to >>> add to the noise. >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Govoni wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I asked here[1] and it said "Ask again later." >>>> >>>> [1] http://8ball.tridelphia.net/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/06/2011 08:46 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Robert. Is there a timetable for that? I'm trying to gauge >>>>> whether it is appropriate to push for my organization to move to the >>>>> current lucene 4.0 implementation (we're using solr cloud which is >>>>> built against trunk) or if it's expected there will be changes to what >>>>> is currently on trunk. I'm not looking for anything hard, just trying >>>>> to plan as much as possible understanding that this is one of the >>>>> implications of using trunk. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jamie Johnson >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a timetable for when it is expected to be finalized? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> it will be finalized when Lucene 4.0 is released. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> lucidimagination.com >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --0015177fd05ce4c03904b39c0383--