lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene 4.0 Index Format Finalization Timetable
Date Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:08 GMT
While we are in constant sync due to the merge, lucene would still be
updated multiple times before a solr 4 release, and it would be subject to
happen at any time - so its really not any different.

On Wednesday, December 7, 2011, Jamie Johnson <jej2003@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, biggest issue for us is we're using the SolrCloud features.
> While I see some good things related to the Lucene and Solr code bases
> being merged, this is certainly a frustrating aspect of it as I don't
> require some of the changes that are in Lucene 4.0  (withstanding
> anything that SolrCloud requires that is).
>
> I think the best solution (assuming it works) is to try to lock a
> version of Lucene 4.0 while upgrading Solr.  I'll have to test to see
> if this works or not, but at least it's something.
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> wrote:
>> My personal view, as a bystander with no more information than you, is
that
>> one has to assume there will be further index format changes before a 4.0
>> release.  This is based on the number of changes in the last 9 months,
and
>> the amount of activity on the dev list.
>>
>> For us the implication is we need to stick w/3.x for now.  You might be
in a
>> different situation if you really need the 4.0 changes.  Maybe you can
just
>> stick w/the current trunk and take responsibility for patching critical
>> bugfixes, hoping you won't have to recreate your index too many times...
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> On 12/06/2011 09:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> I suppose that's fair enough.  Some quick googling seems that this has
>>> been asked many times with pretty much the same response.  Sorry to
>>> add to the noise.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Govoni<darren@ontrenet.com>
 wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I asked here[1] and it said "Ask again later."
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://8ball.tridelphia.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/06/2011 08:46 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Robert.  Is there a timetable for that?  I'm trying to gauge
>>>>> whether it is appropriate to push for my organization to move to the
>>>>> current lucene 4.0 implementation (we're using solr cloud which is
>>>>> built against trunk) or if it's expected there will be changes to what
>>>>> is currently on trunk.  I'm not looking for anything hard, just trying
>>>>> to plan as much as possible understanding that this is one of the
>>>>> implications of using trunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Robert Muir<rcmuir@gmail.com>
 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jamie Johnson<jej2003@gmail.com>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a timetable for when it is expected to be finalized?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it will be finalized when Lucene 4.0 is released.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> lucidimagination.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message