lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene 4.0 Index Format Finalization Timetable
Date Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:12:16 GMT
Yeah, biggest issue for us is we're using the SolrCloud features.
While I see some good things related to the Lucene and Solr code bases
being merged, this is certainly a frustrating aspect of it as I don't
require some of the changes that are in Lucene 4.0  (withstanding
anything that SolrCloud requires that is).

I think the best solution (assuming it works) is to try to lock a
version of Lucene 4.0 while upgrading Solr.  I'll have to test to see
if this works or not, but at least it's something.

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com> wrote:
> My personal view, as a bystander with no more information than you, is that
> one has to assume there will be further index format changes before a 4.0
> release.  This is based on the number of changes in the last 9 months, and
> the amount of activity on the dev list.
>
> For us the implication is we need to stick w/3.x for now.  You might be in a
> different situation if you really need the 4.0 changes.  Maybe you can just
> stick w/the current trunk and take responsibility for patching critical
> bugfixes, hoping you won't have to recreate your index too many times...
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 12/06/2011 09:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>>
>> I suppose that's fair enough.  Some quick googling seems that this has
>> been asked many times with pretty much the same response.  Sorry to
>> add to the noise.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Govoni<darren@ontrenet.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I asked here[1] and it said "Ask again later."
>>>
>>> [1] http://8ball.tridelphia.net/
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/06/2011 08:46 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Robert.  Is there a timetable for that?  I'm trying to gauge
>>>> whether it is appropriate to push for my organization to move to the
>>>> current lucene 4.0 implementation (we're using solr cloud which is
>>>> built against trunk) or if it's expected there will be changes to what
>>>> is currently on trunk.  I'm not looking for anything hard, just trying
>>>> to plan as much as possible understanding that this is one of the
>>>> implications of using trunk.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Robert Muir<rcmuir@gmail.com>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jamie Johnson<jej2003@gmail.com>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a timetable for when it is expected to be finalized?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it will be finalized when Lucene 4.0 is released.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> lucidimagination.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message