Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABuJZc80VedizXTiE6HHFAOuPvU3J8TF7ZbWwHbXTk6Aq4LN6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANDtjgCeVREB-Sx7WLO70N6DMpvCRAQEr1Db1ocnYV_DUtp9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABuJZc80VedizXTiE6HHFAOuPvU3J8TF7ZbWwHbXTk6Aq4LN6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:37:02 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAN4YXvewpqdx2w3btnNKYBRS2+WXtiKE21G+FVDccgy3nTBQxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Modify Field.Index.NO to Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED
From: Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In addition to Peter's comment, changing future documents to
Field.index.NOT_ANALYZED won't affect your current documents.

If (and only if) you stored all your data, you could conceivably
read through your entire index and re-index into another
location and have your PK available. *BUT* the only data you
have available to put in your new documents is in fields for
which Field.Store.YES was specified, fields that were
indexed-only don't have any way to recover the original
data that isn't lossy.

Best
Erick

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:38 AM, ppp c <peter.c.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
> terrible.
>
> you have made a big mistake, since you in fact made the primary key
> unsearchable.
> There is no any other method, since deleteDocument, updateDocument both
> need Term to be searchable.
> The only way is during the traversal of all the docs and finding the
> matched field and delete it.
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thanh Ha <javabytes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I indexed my document using Field.Index.NO as the field index type, so
>> now I cannot search it to make updates.
>> Here's how the document was added:
>>
>> Document doc =3D new Document();
>> doc.add(new Field("content_id", "1234", Field.Store.YES,
>> Field.Index.NO, =A0Field.TermVector.NO));
>>
>> The content_id is the primary key for my documents.
>> Using updateDocument(Term,doc) won't work because the field must be
>> indexed in order to match (?).
>>
>>
>> Since I did store the value, is it possible to update this field index
>> type to Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED ?
>>
>>
>> It will be very difficult to reindex, so any feedback is appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tommy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org