Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 448999B9B for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80165 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2011 16:06:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 80098 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2011 16:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 80064 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2011 16:06:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:06:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.c.eric@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:06:51 +0000 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so1751706qyk.14 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:06:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lO3HFunQiKi3AX6hJKkTI72joaqTgqHyA7ZPZ6QvQmg=; b=aH2nVJ5wtlzUQ70YD7uyXVQ/pMwrJEhHC8TIiFLaY2INZ71NqUWfjPWUue2WIt3kKF R8q8G8KaRC8XVnf5rHfOis6QbfryO6rfVU4ku2mib2yo5SO3pz+XFfctyiowlj1erV4j kvXH+JGS4SevdhRcnmN1JIf6vnZe4Bm1lXVEk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.40.137 with SMTP id k9mr4575511qce.100.1319385990259; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.184.148 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:06:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:06:30 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: reusing the term-frequency count while indexing From: ppp c To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364184ef45639404aff97df2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364184ef45639404aff97df2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Of curse, it can be reused. But from my point of view, it's meaningless, since the analysis process has to be performed to collect such as prox, offset, or syno, payload and so on. On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:22 PM, prasenjit mukherjee wrote: > I already have the term-frequency-count for all the terms in a > document. Is there a way I can re-use that info while indexing. I > would like to use solr for this. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --0016364184ef45639404aff97df2--