Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 131D47F5E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55970 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2011 09:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55114 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2011 09:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55088 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2011 09:23:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:23:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fancyerii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:23:26 +0000 Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so280950wwe.5 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:23:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ApbAEGWRciYKZDRpWjgnykngz10EIguBkEZ8zecAHno=; b=XiqwEaCelJ6K+Fk/UckOMXpCvtpnQ82OlwVk/ec+zCeiqqh1bWZGN9/EoJZgLIj+yD aHAHliBKV21w55jekfqm4p111OFAsztBI174ttd/JRaP3c+fg511K/j1EpX8ysnn7tKB SUVyGfUmum7h4nTc1Wit93iPU0TIullfy07J8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.233.7 with SMTP id o7mr1524141weq.7.1313745786055; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.229.66 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:23:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:23:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to make Lucene effective for video retrieval? From: Li Li To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org lucene now can't support customer ranking function. but you can do some modification such as boost some fields. the meta data of video is not large comparing to other application. so you need not care about performance now. So I suggest you considering something else such as ranking and faceting and clustering(teleplay series are the same name, if not well processed, a full screen is the same result) and collapse ... On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Lei Pang wrote: > Hi, what do u mean about consider about ranking? Do you mean that I should > choose different ranking functions, such as BM25 or Language Model, rather > than Lucene's original ranking function? Thank you. > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Li Li wrote: > >> if there are only text information, your "video search" is just normal full >> text search. but I think you should consider more on ranking, facet search >> etc. >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Lei Pang wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, I want to use Lucene to retrieve videos through their meta >> > data: title, description, tags and comments. Which query type should I >> use? >> > How can I make Lucene effective? Any help would be great appreciated. >> > >> > Best Wishes >> > >> > Yours Sincerely, >> > Pang Lei >> > >> > > > > -- > Best Wishes > > Yours Sincerely, > Pang Lei > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org