From java-user-return-50610-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Tue Aug 23 08:24:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45FE67707 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73870 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2011 08:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73692 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2011 08:24:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73665 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2011 08:24:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:24:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:24:18 +0000 Received: by ywb26 with SMTP id 26so5386959ywb.35 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:23:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=RCsx5VMCgCBYr3Cts7kiV0OQhDqjIsEsHg4kzGFl69s=; b=PaWYpFViHglx0wvAMIkvJmfuYBWaMHS72l2YMvPmuI9qBvzy745YScuiM9GBPpubn/ olJNfUQMwxbAeEf69MeDBhOPthWSPjhOV72+v0xpXVB8sRFB6qKivg8fBgX9LqFzkVWe k0XGy/CHLijC9a/vLhDnYW6tmH4ZId34z/bpk= Received: by 10.42.155.9 with SMTP id s9mr3312462icw.371.1314087837068; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:23:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.176.129 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:23:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1314086436.3772.124.camel@te-prime> References: <1314086436.3772.124.camel@te-prime> From: Dawid Weiss Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:23:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SSD Experience To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, te@statsbiblioteket.dk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8496bb6e8204ab27eaac X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba6e8496bb6e8204ab27eaac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This one is humorous (watch for foul language though). It does get to the point, however, and Bergman is a clever guy: http://www.livestream.com/oreillyconfs/video?clipId=pla_3beec3a2-54f5-4a19-8aaf-35a839b6ecaa Dawid On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 18:49 +0200, Rich Cariens wrote: > > Does anyone have any experiences or stories they can share about how SSDs > > impacted search performance for better or worse? > > Our measurements are getting old, but since spinning disks hasn't > improved and SSDs has improved substantially since then, the conclusion > should be about the same: Buy SSDs. They offer performance rivaling RAM > with the obvious advantages of being persistent in case of power loss. > > Details at http://wiki.statsbiblioteket.dk/summa/Hardware > > > Just be sure that IO really is your bottleneck before you improve on > that part. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --90e6ba6e8496bb6e8204ab27eaac--