lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Sokolov <soko...@ifactory.com>
Subject Re: highlighting performance
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:54:50 GMT
Koji- I'm not familiar with the benchmarking system, but maybe I'll see 
if I can run that benchmark on my test data as a point of comparison - 
thanks for the pointer!

-Mike

On 6/20/2011 8:21 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Mike,
>
> FVH used to be faster for large docs. I wrote FVH section for Lucene 
> in Action and it said:
>
> In contrib/benchmark (covered in appendix C), there’s an algorithm
> file called highlight-vs-vector-highlight.alg that lets you see the 
> difference
> between two highlighters in processing time. As of version 2.9, with 
> modern hardware,
> that algorithm shows that FastVectorHighlighter is about two and a 
> half times faster
> than Highlighter.
>
> The number was for Lucene 2.9 age and Wikipedia data, maybe different 
> today.
>
> Anyway, thank you for sharing interesting result!
>
> koji


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message