Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simon.willnauer@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=qbvKGjQYTEM94G+QklLjBJytLHATJEVgIskPLbnJbbyoJQANart8SUCTZrJvVOnSao
         mEb+wdhQcyFaLCg0CUP7l0INTftVkkUV7qsn/Ry5RPSIN1X0AnWDsOqAOcKEVE5tI69m
         awtx3/FESnvfniTPTWdM0TUptLISmvHgdJh4Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: simon.willnauer@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTind+0eRE93abB=hXgwd30+XuvNufA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimNeQZKpVp7SL4yCZFRrEYpkDHiHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=oaSkPv6QrCFKcHFn+bxur-ovzUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTind+0eRE93abB=hXgwd30+XuvNufA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:20:47 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinj+OhSsTMRe=o=QHpWfr9kfT3x9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: speed of CheckIndex
From: Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@googlemail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

what kind of diagnostics are you looking for?

simon

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:14 PM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Erick, but I guess what you refer to lives in Solr right? I am using
> plain Lucene.
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> What information do you need? Could you just ping the stats component
>> and parse the results (basically the info on the admin/stats page).
>>
>> Best
>> Erick
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I need to collect some diagnostic info from customer sites, so I would
>> like
>> > to get info on the status of lucene indexes...but I don't want the
>> process
>> > of collecting to take very long.
>> >
>> > So I am considering Checkindex. I tested in a small index (60k docs) and
>> it
>> > took 12 seconds. A site usually has up to 100 indexes (indexes have 6
>> > fields) so running it for every index like this is unfeasible.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to make is faster (even if it verifies less things?). Is
>> the
>> > time Checkindex will take proportional to number of docs? I am on Lucene
>> > 3.1
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org