lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: speed of CheckIndex
Date Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:20:47 GMT
what kind of diagnostics are you looking for?

simon

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:14 PM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Erick, but I guess what you refer to lives in Solr right? I am using
> plain Lucene.
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> What information do you need? Could you just ping the stats component
>> and parse the results (basically the info on the admin/stats page).
>>
>> Best
>> Erick
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I need to collect some diagnostic info from customer sites, so I would
>> like
>> > to get info on the status of lucene indexes...but I don't want the
>> process
>> > of collecting to take very long.
>> >
>> > So I am considering Checkindex. I tested in a small index (60k docs) and
>> it
>> > took 12 seconds. A site usually has up to 100 indexes (indexes have 6
>> > fields) so running it for every index like this is unfeasible.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to make is faster (even if it verifies less things?). Is
>> the
>> > time Checkindex will take proportional to number of docs? I am on Lucene
>> > 3.1
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message